Single-sequence protein structure prediction
Predict three-dimensional protein structures directly from one sequence without supplying alignments, templates, or homologous sequences.
More protein structure prediction workflows
Tools for single-sequence protein structure prediction
Use these methods to prepare inputs, run the core analysis, inspect outputs, and validate the evidence described in this workflow.
ESMFold
Fast single-sequence structure prediction
ESMFold2
Language-model folding with mmCIF and confidence outputs
MiniFold
Rapid lightweight single-sequence prediction
IntelliFold 2
Controllable biomolecular prediction
AlphaFold2
Compare with free single-sequence or MSA-assisted modes
OpenFold3
Alternative all-atom structure prediction
Boltz-2
Alternative biomolecular structure prediction
PDBFixer
Repair selected PDB models
MolProbity
Review stereochemical quality
Ramachandran plot
Inspect backbone torsions
USAlign
Measure agreement between predictions
DSSP
Assign coordinate-derived secondary structure
What is single-sequence protein structure prediction?
Single-sequence protein structure prediction is the computational process of building a three-dimensional protein model from one amino-acid sequence without requiring a supplied multiple sequence alignment or template. Modern methods obtain structural signal from protein language models, but accuracy remains sequence- and region-dependent.
These models trade explicit user-supplied evolutionary input for representations learned from large sequence collections. They reduce setup time and are useful when MSA construction is slow or homologs are sparse.
No supplied MSA does not make a model evidence-free: training data still informs the representation. Compare predictors, retain native confidence outputs, and inspect domain packing, termini, and flexible regions carefully.
When to use single-sequence protein structure prediction
Use a sequence-only predictor when an MSA is unavailable or unnecessary for the first pass:
- A protein has few detectable homologs.
- You need a fold hypothesis for construct or domain planning.
- Several model families can be compared on the same sequence.
Strengths and limitations
One reviewed FASTA can produce a structural hypothesis without a separate alignment-search workflow. Running ESMFold, ESMFold2 and MiniFold side by side shows whether a region or domain arrangement depends on the model family.
The predictors still inherit training-set knowledge, and local confidence does not guarantee correct domain packing. Flexible termini, long linkers and oligomer-dependent regions are common sources of ambiguity. A single-sequence model does not establish the biologically relevant state.
Applications of single sequence protein structure prediction
Single-sequence predictors are useful when an MSA search is unavailable, slow or uninformative for an orphan protein. They can supply a first fold hypothesis for construct design, domain annotation or further structural analysis.
Comparing several model families can reveal whether a domain arrangement is stable across assumptions. Similar coordinates alone do not validate a novel fold, especially for disordered segments or oligomer-dependent regions.
How to run single-sequence protein structure prediction online
- Prepare one sequence. Confirm construct boundaries, ambiguous residues and whether the biological state is monomeric.
- Run the predictor panel. Generate models with ESMFold from the same FASTA.
- Compare newer and smaller models. Review ESMFold2 outputs and the separate MiniFold branch without merging their native scores.
- Inspect local confidence. Mark uncertain loops, termini and interdomain orientation before choosing a model.
- Export alternatives. Keep all structures, native confidence files and model settings for downstream validation.
How to interpret single sequence protein structure prediction results
Local confidence can identify regions a model considers uncertain, but it does not establish the relative orientation of domains or the biologically relevant conformational state. Compare structures after alignment and report disagreements explicitly.
A predicted fold supports further investigation; it does not measure stability, binding, activity or function.
How single-sequence protein structure prediction works
Submit one FASTA sequence to ESMFold, ESMFold2, and MiniFold and compare their structures and confidence.
- Clean the sequence. Provide one ungapped amino-acid sequence with the correct biological boundaries.
- Run language-model predictors. Run ESMFold, ESMFold2, and MiniFold from the shared workflow input.
- Collect native confidence. Download every model and retain pLDDT, PAE, or other native confidence outputs when returned.
- Compare model agreement. Align the predictions and inspect domain packing, termini, loops, and low-confidence segments.
- Select regions for validation. Choose a model or ensemble for the downstream question and record the selection rationale.
Inputs and outputs
Check formats before running, then inspect and download the result from every workflow step.
Inputs
Research input
FASTAPDBmmCIFOne protein sequence in FASTA or plain-text format.
Outputs
Prediction and review outputs
PDBmmCIFCSVJSONPredicted PDB or mmCIF structures with model-native confidence and downloadable files.
Frequently asked questions
Single-sequence protein structure prediction is the computational process of building a three-dimensional protein model from one amino-acid sequence without requiring a supplied multiple sequence alignment or template. Modern methods obtain structural signal from protein language models, but accuracy remains sequence- and region-dependent.
Fast prediction, orphan proteins, sparse homologs, and high-throughput sequence triage. The required starting evidence is one ungapped protein sequence.
Keep each tool’s native confidence definition. Confidence estimates expected model error or consistency; it is not a probability that a biological hypothesis is true.
Treat low-confidence regions, inter-domain orientations, and long insertions as hypotheses. Cross-check conserved motifs and test important structural claims experimentally.
Public managed prediction services range from free noncommercial AlphaFold Server access to published core rates such as $125 for a first UW–Madison prediction. ProteinIQ Plus is $29 per month and Pro is $99 per month. Compute-heavy predictions consume credits according to the selected model and sequence length; expert project support is scoped separately.
AI answers from our docs. No sign-in needed.
Run your first analysis today
Start with 200 free credits and no installs. Upgrade when your project needs more compute.