Antibody structure prediction
Predict antibody variable-domain structures from paired chains and examine framework, CDR-loop, and residue-level confidence.
More protein structure prediction workflows
Tools for antibody structure prediction
Use these methods to prepare inputs, run the core analysis, inspect outputs, and validate the evidence described in this workflow.
ABodyBuilder3
Predict paired antibody variable-domain structures
ImmuneBuilder
Predict antibodies, nanobodies, and immune receptors
ANARCI
Number and classify antibody variable domains
AlphaFold2
Provide a general-model comparison
ESMFold2
Provide a multi-chain language-model comparison
Boltz-2
Predict antibody-containing complexes
Chai-1
Predict multi-component biomolecular structures
PDBFixer
Repair selected antibody PDB files
MolProbity
Check stereochemical quality
Ramachandran plot
Inspect loop backbone torsions
ParaSurf
Map predicted paratope surface regions
USAlign
Compare antibody models or references
What is antibody structure prediction?
Antibody structure prediction is the computational process of building three-dimensional antibody variable domains from heavy- and light-chain sequences. It gives specialized attention to conserved frameworks and diverse complementarity-determining-region loops, with CDR-H3 commonly remaining the most uncertain loop.
Antibody-specialized models use the conserved immunoglobulin fold while learning variable loop geometries that shape antigen recognition. Correct chain pairing and complete variable-domain boundaries are foundational requirements.
Read confidence at residue and loop level. A strong framework does not guarantee an accurate CDR-H3 conformation, and an unbound model can rearrange upon antigen binding.
When to use antibody structure prediction
Use antibody models when paired variable-domain geometry matters:
- VH and VL sequences are available for one antibody.
- CDR mutations need a structural context.
- You want to compare uncertain loops before docking to an antigen.
Strengths and limitations
Antibody-specialized predictors use the conserved framework to focus on variable-domain packing and CDR geometry. Comparing two model families can identify loops whose interpretation depends on the predictor.
The conserved framework may look reliable while CDR-H3 remains uncertain. Incorrect heavy–light pairing invalidates the interface, and antigen binding may change loop conformations. A predicted unbound paratope does not establish recognition.
Antibody-model interpretation
ABodyBuilder3 and ImmuneBuilder are trained for immune-receptor geometry rather than general proteins. Compare framework alignment and each CDR separately; numbering with ANARCI can map equivalent positions, while surface tools contextualize rather than validate coordinates.
Applications of antibody structure prediction
A variable-domain model can help map CDR mutations, inspect framework packing or prepare a structural hypothesis for antigen-binding studies. Paired-chain input matters because heavy–light orientation shapes the paratope.
Comparing antibody-specialized models is particularly useful at CDR-H3, where sequence diversity and loop flexibility make confident-looking predictions easy to overinterpret.
How to run antibody structure prediction online
- Confirm chain pairing. Provide the correct VH and VL sequences and boundaries as separate FASTA inputs.
- Run antibody models. Generate a paired variable-domain model with ABodyBuilder3.
- Compare the second branch. Review ImmuneBuilder with its configured antibody model and keep confidence outputs by method.
- Inspect loops. Compare each CDR and framework region separately, noting uncertain H3 conformations and chain orientation.
- Export for validation. Retain paired sequences, numbering context, structures and confidence for antigen-bound or experimental follow-up.
How to interpret antibody structure prediction results
Framework confidence and loop confidence must be read separately. Two models can agree on the conserved fold while disagreeing at the residues that govern recognition. Neither result establishes the bound paratope conformation.
Use CDR differences to prioritize structural or mutational tests. An unbound antibody model does not confirm antigen affinity, specificity or function.
How antibody structure prediction works
Send paired VH and VL sequences to ABodyBuilder3 and ImmuneBuilder and retain both structures and confidence estimates.
- Verify chain identity. Confirm the heavy and light sequences are correctly paired and cover the intended variable domains.
- Trim variable domains. Provide VH and VL as separate workflow inputs.
- Run antibody models. Run ABodyBuilder3 and ImmuneBuilder with their documented model settings.
- Inspect CDR confidence. Compare framework superposition, CDR-loop geometry, and residue-level confidence.
- Prepare downstream validation. Export both structures and use antigen-bound data, mutagenesis, or experimental structures for validation.
Inputs and outputs
Check formats before running, then inspect and download the result from every workflow step.
Inputs
Research input
FASTAPDBmmCIFPaired VH and VL amino-acid sequences with correct variable-domain boundaries.
Outputs
Prediction and review outputs
PDBmmCIFCSVJSONPredicted antibody PDB structures with model-native per-residue confidence or error estimates.
Frequently asked questions
Antibody structure prediction is the computational process of building three-dimensional antibody variable domains from heavy- and light-chain sequences. It gives specialized attention to conserved frameworks and diverse complementarity-determining region loops, with CDR-H3 commonly remaining the most uncertain loop.
Antibody engineering, structural triage, paratope analysis, and downstream complex modeling. The required starting evidence is correctly paired variable-domain heavy and light chain sequences.
Keep each tool’s native confidence definition. Confidence estimates expected model error or consistency; it is not a probability that a biological hypothesis is true.
Assess each CDR independently and avoid treating high framework confidence as evidence for the antigen-bound paratope conformation.
Specialized antibody predictions consume model-dependent ProteinIQ credits; broader managed modeling engagements are typically quote-based. ProteinIQ Plus is $29 per month and Pro is $99 per month. Compute-heavy predictions consume credits according to the selected model and sequence length; expert project support is scoped separately.
AI answers from our docs. No sign-in needed.
Run your first analysis today
Start with 200 free credits and no installs. Upgrade when your project needs more compute.