Use case
Protein complex structure prediction
Predict multi-chain protein assemblies and compare interface geometry, stoichiometry assumptions, confidence, and model agreement.
Inputs
1 required
Methods
4 connected
- 01AlphaFold2 Multimer
- 02ESMFold2 Complex
- 03Boltz-2
- 04Protenix v2
Run four multimer-capable predictors from the same multi-record FASTA and compare their interface confidence and assembly geometry.
Use this templateWhat is protein complex structure prediction?
Protein complex structure prediction is the computational process of building the three-dimensional arrangement and interfaces of two or more protein chains from their sequences and specified composition. It differs from docking because the model may predict partner folds and assembly jointly rather than starting from fixed monomer structures.
Complex prediction depends on more than individual fold quality. Researchers must specify the biologically relevant chains and stoichiometry, then judge whether the predicted interface is supported by interface confidence, model recurrence, known residues, and cellular context.
A plausible high-confidence interface is not proof that two proteins interact in vivo. Incorrect paralogs, missing cofactors, alternative oligomeric states, and training-set familiarity can all produce misleadingly neat assemblies.
When to use protein complex structure prediction
- Suitable protein complex structure prediction question. Oligomeric assemblies and protein interaction hypotheses when partner sequences are known
- Inputs and evidence are available. Correct partner sequences, chain multiplicity, and intended stoichiometry
- A validation plan is in place. Use interface-specific confidence and orthogonal interaction evidence. Validate decisive contacts with mutagenesis, crosslinking, binding measurements, or experimental structure determination.
Benefits of protein complex structure prediction
- Predicts folds and interfaces jointly.
- Supports alternative-model comparison.
- Generates explicit interaction hypotheses.
Primary limitations
- Stoichiometry must be specified correctly.
- Confident interfaces can be biologically irrelevant.
- Large assemblies may exceed model or compute limits.
Protein complex structure prediction methods and interpretation
Multimer predictors use learned geometric and evolutionary information to place chains jointly. Chain-pair PAE, ipTM-like scores, and interface residue confidence are generally more relevant than monomer-wide confidence when evaluating an assembly.
Compare alternative stoichiometries only when biologically plausible. A larger assembly can gain contacts simply because more chains were supplied, so conclusions need orthogonal evidence such as co-purification, crosslinking, mutagenesis, or cryo-EM.
How to run protein complex structure prediction online
The ProteinIQ workflow keeps the inputs, actual tool runs, method-native files, and comparison outputs together. Follow these steps while preserving the scientific boundary described above.
- Define partners and stoichiometry. Create one FASTA record per chain and duplicate records only when the proposed stoichiometry requires it.
- Prepare chain sequences. Run AlphaFold2 Multimer, ESMFold2, Boltz-2, and Protenix from the same input.
- Run multimer models. Retain ranked models and every chain-aware confidence output.
- Inspect interface confidence. Inspect interfaces, clashes, buried surface, PAE blocks, and agreement across model families.
- Compare biological support. Prioritize assemblies that agree with biochemical and cellular evidence, then export models and provenance.
How protein complex structure prediction works
Run four multimer-capable predictors from the same multi-record FASTA and compare their interface confidence and assembly geometry.
- Define partners and stoichiometry. Create one FASTA record per chain and duplicate records only when the proposed stoichiometry requires it.
- Prepare chain sequences. Run AlphaFold2 Multimer, ESMFold2, Boltz-2, and Protenix from the same input.
- Run multimer models. Retain ranked models and every chain-aware confidence output.
- Inspect interface confidence. Inspect interfaces, clashes, buried surface, PAE blocks, and agreement across model families.
- Compare biological support. Prioritize assemblies that agree with biochemical and cellular evidence, then export models and provenance.
Inputs and outputs
Check formats before running, then inspect and download the result from every workflow step.
Inputs
- Research input.
FASTAPDBmmCIFA multi-record protein FASTA containing each intended chain with the correct multiplicity.
Outputs
- Prediction and review outputs.
PDBmmCIFCSVJSONRanked complex models, chain-aware confidence metrics, PAE or interface scores, and downloadable structures.
Tools for protein complex structure prediction
Use these methods to prepare inputs, run the core analysis, inspect outputs, and validate the evidence described in this workflow.

AlphaFold2
AlphaFold2 Multimer complex prediction

ESMFold2
Sequence-based multi-chain prediction

Boltz-2
All-atom biomolecular complex prediction

Chai-1
Multi-component structure prediction

OpenFold-3
Open all-atom complex prediction

Protenix v2
Multi-chain biomolecular prediction

RosettaFold3
Protein and biomolecular complex prediction

IPSAE
Analyze interface confidence from predicted alignments

DockQ
Benchmark complexes against a native reference

PDBsum
Summarize interfaces and contacts

MolProbity
Check stereochemical plausibility

USAlign
Compare alternative complex structures
Other protein engineering workflows
Compare related approaches based on the molecular system, available evidence, required inputs, and decision you need to support.
Homology modeling
Builds a target model from one or more experimentally determined structures of related proteins.
Protein secondary structure prediction
Predicts residue-level helix, strand, and coil states rather than a complete atomic structure.
Single-sequence protein structure prediction
Infers a three-dimensional protein model directly from one sequence without a user-supplied MSA.
Antibody structure prediction
Uses antibody-specialized models to predict variable-domain frameworks and complementarity-determining regions.
Peptide structure prediction
Predicts conformations for short, often flexible linear or cyclic amino-acid chains.
Transmembrane protein structure prediction
Predicts membrane-protein folds while interpreting hydrophobic segments and membrane-topology context.
Frequently asked questions
Protein complex structure prediction is the computational process of building the three-dimensional arrangement and interfaces of two or more protein chains from their sequences and specified composition. It differs from docking because the model may predict partner folds and assembly jointly rather than starting from fixed monomer structures.
Oligomeric assemblies and protein interaction hypotheses when partner sequences are known. The required starting evidence is correct partner sequences, chain multiplicity, and intended stoichiometry.
Keep each tool’s native confidence definition. Confidence estimates expected model error or consistency; it is not a probability that a biological hypothesis is true.
Use interface-specific confidence and orthogonal interaction evidence. Validate decisive contacts with mutagenesis, crosslinking, binding measurements, or experimental structure determination.
Complex predictions are usually more compute-intensive than monomer runs; public full-service structure analysis can be priced by expert day rather than by model. ProteinIQ Plus is $29 per month and Pro is $99 per month. Compute-heavy predictions consume credits according to the selected model and sequence length; expert project support is scoped separately.
Start with a workflow you can inspect and edit
Add your inputs, review the settings, and keep every structure, score, table, and file connected to the step that produced it.