Protenix icon

Protenix

(v2.0.0)Code (opens in a new tab)Paper (opens in a new tab)Docs

Open-source biomolecular structure prediction with Protenix

Add a molecule to begin

Choose a building block to assemble your structure.

Output

Configure inputs to begin

Set options on the left, then click “Submit job”.

What is Protenix?

Protenix is ByteDance Research's open-source biomolecular structure prediction model. It predicts 3D structures of complexes containing proteins, DNA, RNA, small molecule ligands, and metal ions from sequence or structural inputs, all in a single run.

Protenix follows the AlphaFold 3 all-atom structure-prediction architecture. ProteinIQ runs the Protenix v1 base checkpoint by default, with additional base, constraint, mini, and tiny variants available for comparison or faster exploratory runs.

How to use Protenix online

ProteinIQ runs Protenix on GPU infrastructure with no local installation. Add one or more molecules, optionally configure seeds and model, then submit. Results arrive as downloadable CIF files ranked by confidence score, viewable directly in the 3D structure viewer. Each ranked prediction also includes the Protenix summary-confidence JSON, and you can optionally export atom-level confidence JSON for deeper inspection. MSA search is off by default; enabling it can add several minutes but may improve protein predictions that benefit from evolutionary context.

Inputs

Each molecule is added as a separate entity. Up to 10 entries of each type are supported.

InputAccepted formats
ProteinFASTA sequence, PDB file, or 4-letter RCSB PDB ID
LigandSMILES string, CCD code (e.g. ATP), SDF/MOL file, or PubChem compound ID
DNAFASTA sequence (A, T, G, C)
RNAFASTA sequence (A, U, G, C)
IonCCD code (e.g. ZN, MG, CA, FE)
Paired MSAOptional uploaded or pasted .a3m alignment attached to a protein chain label
Unpaired MSAOptional uploaded or pasted .a3m alignment attached to a protein chain label
RNA MSAOptional uploaded or pasted .a3m alignment attached to an RNA chain label

For ligand files, Protenix requires a 3D conformer. 2D SDF files (flat structure with no z-coordinates) will fail at featurization.

Precomputed alignments attach to the chain letters shown on the main protein or RNA molecule cards. If there is only one eligible protein or RNA chain, you can leave the MSA target label blank and ProteinIQ will attach it automatically. Paired MSA and Unpaired MSA are separate native inputs; RNA only supports unpaired RNA-MSA in this pass. Template files are still out of scope here.

Settings

SettingDescription
Model seedsNumber of random seeds (1-5, default 1). Each seed independently samples the diffusion trajectory and produces a distinct set of structures.
ModelModel variant. Protenix v1 base is the default. See model options below.
Use MSAWhether to run multiple sequence alignment for protein chains (default off). Adds 2-5 minutes but can improve accuracy, especially for proteins with many homologs.
Samples per seedStructures generated per seed (1-5, default 5). Higher values increase output diversity.
Training-Free GuidanceApplies physical constraints (steric, torsion, distance) during diffusion sampling to improve geometric plausibility. Off by default; adds compute overhead.
Export atom confidence JSONSaves the full_data JSON for each prediction. Useful for debugging or downstream analysis, but larger than the default summary metrics.

Model options

ModelParametersTraining cutoffWhen to use
Protenix v1 base368M2021-09-30Default model for general structure prediction.
Protenix v1 base (2025 data)368M2025-06-30Targets with templates deposited after 2021.
Protenix mini135M2021-09-30Rapid screening, large sequences, or quick estimates before a full run. Roughly 40% faster.

How does Protenix work?

Protenix implements the AlphaFold 3 architecture, which replaces the iterative refinement of AlphaFold 2 with a diffusion-based structure generation process. Prediction starts from randomly initialized atom coordinates and progressively denoises them into a coherent structure over multiple cycles.

Multiple Sequence Alignment

For protein inputs, Protenix queries external MSA databases to find evolutionarily related sequences. Conserved residues and co-evolving residue pairs reveal spatial constraints that guide the structure prediction. The MSA step connects to an external server and is the primary source of runtime variability, typically adding 2-5 minutes per prediction.

If you already have alignments, ProteinIQ can use precomputed .a3m files instead of forcing a new search. Protein chains can receive separate paired and unpaired MSAs, while RNA chains can receive an unpaired RNA-MSA. These uploads are written to temporary files and referenced through the pairedMsaPath and unpairedMsaPath JSON fields used by Protenix.

Confidence estimation

Protenix outputs per-atom and per-residue confidence estimates derived from the same network that produces the structure. These are not validated against experimental data for each prediction; they reflect the model's internal consistency. A high-confidence prediction that matches an incorrect prior (e.g. a homolog with a different binding mode) may score well while being physically wrong.

Understanding the results

Protenix outputs ranked CIF files together with the native summary-confidence JSON for each prediction.

MetricScopeInterpretation
pLDDTPer-residue, 0-100>90: high confidence. 70-90: backbone likely correct. 50-70: low confidence. <50: likely disordered or unreliable.
pTMWhole structure, 0-1>0.5 suggests the overall fold is correct.
ipTMInter-chain interfaces, 0-1>0.7 indicates a reliable interface prediction. Particularly relevant for protein-protein and protein-ligand complexes.

ProteinIQ also preserves the additional native metrics and flags from summary_confidence, including ranking_score, gpde, per-chain confidence summaries, pairwise interface scores, clash flags, disorder estimates, and the recycle count used for the prediction.

When running multiple seeds, structural agreement across the top-ranked predictions is a better indicator of reliability than any single confidence score. Divergent predictions across seeds suggest the structure is genuinely uncertain.

When to use Protenix vs alternatives

The main differences are molecule scope, evolutionary inputs, guidance options, and whether the result describes one structure, an ensemble, or binding affinity.

ToolBest forKey distinction
ProtenixGeneral all-atom complexesMultiple model sizes, protein and RNA MSAs, optional atom confidence; no affinity prediction or user restraints.
Boltz-2Protein-ligand structure and affinityReturns binder probability and affinity estimates; supports templates, constraints, and CCD covalent bonds.
Chai-1Guided complex predictionCombines MSA and template search with contact, pocket, and modified-residue inputs.
OpenFold 3Open AlphaFold 3 research workflowsTrainable research preview with automatic MSA generation and low-memory inference.
RosettaFold3Alternative all-atom complex predictionHandles proteins, DNA, RNA, and ligands with multi-model sampling.
IntelliFold 2Fast multi-component predictionOffers a fast Flash model, optional MSA generation, and ranked complex structures.
AlphaFold2Protein monomers and multimersEstablished protein-only workflow with single-sequence or MSA-assisted prediction.
ESMFold2Protein chains and protein complexesLanguage-model folding with no MSA search and optional PAE and pair-chain ipTM outputs.
ESMFoldRapid single-sequence protein foldingPredicts protein structures without an MSA and returns PDB, pLDDT, and optional PAE.
AlphaFlowProtein conformational ensemblesSamples multiple structures to represent flexibility rather than one static prediction.
HighFoldCyclic peptide structuresModels head-to-tail cyclization and disulfide constraints with an AlphaFold2-derived method.

Protenix is a strong default for unconstrained complexes containing several molecule types. Boltz-2 is the clearer choice for ligand affinity or pocket guidance, while Chai-1 is useful when templates, known contacts, or modified residues should influence the model.

Folding models predict structures from sequences and chemical inputs. For docking into a prepared receptor, AutoDock Vina searches a defined box and reports scores in kcal/mol, while DiffDock predicts ligand poses without a predefined box.

Table of contents

Related tools

Chai-1

Chai-1

Predict 3D structures for proteins, ligands, DNA, RNA, and multi-component complexes.

IntelliFold 2

IntelliFold 2

Predict controllable biomolecular structures for proteins, ligands, DNA, RNA, and complexes.

OpenDDE

OpenDDE

All-atom biomolecular structure prediction

OpenFold-3

OpenFold-3

Open-source AlphaFold3-based structure prediction for proteins, ligands, DNA, and RNA

RosettaFold3

RosettaFold3

Open-source structure prediction for proteins, nucleic acids, and ligands

Boltz-2

Boltz-2

Predict biomolecular complex structures and binding affinities for proteins, ligands, DNA, and RNA.

LMI4Boltz

LMI4Boltz

Low-memory Boltz inference for biomolecular structure and affinity prediction

Boltz-2.1

Boltz-2.1

Structure and binding prediction for proteins, DNA, RNA and ligands.

ABodyBuilder3

ABodyBuilder3

Predict paired antibody variable-domain structures from heavy and light chain sequences.

AlphaFlow

AlphaFlow

Generate protein conformational ensembles from sequence or structure inputs.