
Protenix
Open-source biomolecular structure prediction with Protenix
What is Protenix?
Protenix is ByteDance Research's open-source biomolecular structure prediction model. It predicts 3D structures of complexes containing proteins, DNA, RNA, small molecule ligands, and metal ions from sequence or structural inputs, all in a single run.
Protenix follows the AlphaFold 3 all-atom structure-prediction architecture. ProteinIQ runs the Protenix v1 base checkpoint by default, with additional base, constraint, mini, and tiny variants available for comparison or faster exploratory runs.
How to use Protenix online
ProteinIQ runs Protenix on GPU infrastructure with no local installation. Add one or more molecules, optionally configure seeds and model, then submit. Results arrive as downloadable CIF files ranked by confidence score, viewable directly in the 3D structure viewer. Each ranked prediction also includes the Protenix summary-confidence JSON, and you can optionally export atom-level confidence JSON for deeper inspection. MSA search is off by default; enabling it can add several minutes but may improve protein predictions that benefit from evolutionary context.
Inputs
Each molecule is added as a separate entity. Up to 10 entries of each type are supported.
| Input | Accepted formats |
|---|---|
| Protein | FASTA sequence, PDB file, or 4-letter RCSB PDB ID |
| Ligand | SMILES string, CCD code (e.g. ATP), SDF/MOL file, or PubChem compound ID |
| DNA | FASTA sequence (A, T, G, C) |
| RNA | FASTA sequence (A, U, G, C) |
| Ion | CCD code (e.g. ZN, MG, CA, FE) |
| Paired MSA | Optional uploaded or pasted .a3m alignment attached to a protein chain label |
| Unpaired MSA | Optional uploaded or pasted .a3m alignment attached to a protein chain label |
| RNA MSA | Optional uploaded or pasted .a3m alignment attached to an RNA chain label |
For ligand files, Protenix requires a 3D conformer. 2D SDF files (flat structure with no z-coordinates) will fail at featurization.
Precomputed alignments attach to the chain letters shown on the main protein or RNA molecule cards. If there is only one eligible protein or RNA chain, you can leave the MSA target label blank and ProteinIQ will attach it automatically. Paired MSA and Unpaired MSA are separate native inputs; RNA only supports unpaired RNA-MSA in this pass. Template files are still out of scope here.
Settings
| Setting | Description |
|---|---|
Model seeds | Number of random seeds (1-5, default 1). Each seed independently samples the diffusion trajectory and produces a distinct set of structures. |
Model | Model variant. Protenix v1 base is the default. See model options below. |
Use MSA | Whether to run multiple sequence alignment for protein chains (default off). Adds 2-5 minutes but can improve accuracy, especially for proteins with many homologs. |
Samples per seed | Structures generated per seed (1-5, default 5). Higher values increase output diversity. |
Training-Free Guidance | Applies physical constraints (steric, torsion, distance) during diffusion sampling to improve geometric plausibility. Off by default; adds compute overhead. |
Export atom confidence JSON | Saves the full_data JSON for each prediction. Useful for debugging or downstream analysis, but larger than the default summary metrics. |
Model options
| Model | Parameters | Training cutoff | When to use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protenix v1 base | 368M | 2021-09-30 | Default model for general structure prediction. |
| Protenix v1 base (2025 data) | 368M | 2025-06-30 | Targets with templates deposited after 2021. |
| Protenix mini | 135M | 2021-09-30 | Rapid screening, large sequences, or quick estimates before a full run. Roughly 40% faster. |
How does Protenix work?
Protenix implements the AlphaFold 3 architecture, which replaces the iterative refinement of AlphaFold 2 with a diffusion-based structure generation process. Prediction starts from randomly initialized atom coordinates and progressively denoises them into a coherent structure over multiple cycles.
Multiple Sequence Alignment
For protein inputs, Protenix queries external MSA databases to find evolutionarily related sequences. Conserved residues and co-evolving residue pairs reveal spatial constraints that guide the structure prediction. The MSA step connects to an external server and is the primary source of runtime variability, typically adding 2-5 minutes per prediction.
If you already have alignments, ProteinIQ can use precomputed .a3m files instead of forcing a new search. Protein chains can receive separate paired and unpaired MSAs, while RNA chains can receive an unpaired RNA-MSA. These uploads are written to temporary files and referenced through the pairedMsaPath and unpairedMsaPath JSON fields used by Protenix.
Confidence estimation
Protenix outputs per-atom and per-residue confidence estimates derived from the same network that produces the structure. These are not validated against experimental data for each prediction; they reflect the model's internal consistency. A high-confidence prediction that matches an incorrect prior (e.g. a homolog with a different binding mode) may score well while being physically wrong.
Understanding the results
Protenix outputs ranked CIF files together with the native summary-confidence JSON for each prediction.
| Metric | Scope | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| pLDDT | Per-residue, 0-100 | >90: high confidence. 70-90: backbone likely correct. 50-70: low confidence. <50: likely disordered or unreliable. |
| pTM | Whole structure, 0-1 | >0.5 suggests the overall fold is correct. |
| ipTM | Inter-chain interfaces, 0-1 | >0.7 indicates a reliable interface prediction. Particularly relevant for protein-protein and protein-ligand complexes. |
ProteinIQ also preserves the additional native metrics and flags from summary_confidence, including ranking_score, gpde, per-chain confidence summaries, pairwise interface scores, clash flags, disorder estimates, and the recycle count used for the prediction.
When running multiple seeds, structural agreement across the top-ranked predictions is a better indicator of reliability than any single confidence score. Divergent predictions across seeds suggest the structure is genuinely uncertain.
When to use Protenix vs alternatives
The main differences are molecule scope, evolutionary inputs, guidance options, and whether the result describes one structure, an ensemble, or binding affinity.
| Tool | Best for | Key distinction |
|---|---|---|
| Protenix | General all-atom complexes | Multiple model sizes, protein and RNA MSAs, optional atom confidence; no affinity prediction or user restraints. |
| Boltz-2 | Protein-ligand structure and affinity | Returns binder probability and affinity estimates; supports templates, constraints, and CCD covalent bonds. |
| Chai-1 | Guided complex prediction | Combines MSA and template search with contact, pocket, and modified-residue inputs. |
| OpenFold 3 | Open AlphaFold 3 research workflows | Trainable research preview with automatic MSA generation and low-memory inference. |
| RosettaFold3 | Alternative all-atom complex prediction | Handles proteins, DNA, RNA, and ligands with multi-model sampling. |
| IntelliFold 2 | Fast multi-component prediction | Offers a fast Flash model, optional MSA generation, and ranked complex structures. |
| AlphaFold2 | Protein monomers and multimers | Established protein-only workflow with single-sequence or MSA-assisted prediction. |
| ESMFold2 | Protein chains and protein complexes | Language-model folding with no MSA search and optional PAE and pair-chain ipTM outputs. |
| ESMFold | Rapid single-sequence protein folding | Predicts protein structures without an MSA and returns PDB, pLDDT, and optional PAE. |
| AlphaFlow | Protein conformational ensembles | Samples multiple structures to represent flexibility rather than one static prediction. |
| HighFold | Cyclic peptide structures | Models head-to-tail cyclization and disulfide constraints with an AlphaFold2-derived method. |
Protenix is a strong default for unconstrained complexes containing several molecule types. Boltz-2 is the clearer choice for ligand affinity or pocket guidance, while Chai-1 is useful when templates, known contacts, or modified residues should influence the model.
Folding models predict structures from sequences and chemical inputs. For docking into a prepared receptor, AutoDock Vina searches a defined box and reports scores in kcal/mol, while DiffDock predicts ligand poses without a predefined box.
Related tools
Chai-1
Predict 3D structures for proteins, ligands, DNA, RNA, and multi-component complexes.
IntelliFold 2
Predict controllable biomolecular structures for proteins, ligands, DNA, RNA, and complexes.
OpenDDE
All-atom biomolecular structure prediction
OpenFold-3
Open-source AlphaFold3-based structure prediction for proteins, ligands, DNA, and RNA
RosettaFold3
Open-source structure prediction for proteins, nucleic acids, and ligands
Boltz-2
Predict biomolecular complex structures and binding affinities for proteins, ligands, DNA, and RNA.
LMI4Boltz
Low-memory Boltz inference for biomolecular structure and affinity prediction
Boltz-2.1
Structure and binding prediction for proteins, DNA, RNA and ligands.
ABodyBuilder3
Predict paired antibody variable-domain structures from heavy and light chain sequences.
AlphaFlow
Generate protein conformational ensembles from sequence or structure inputs.