Use case
Enzyme design
Build protein scaffolds around catalytic geometry, redesign ligand-aware sequences, and connect computation to biochemical testing.
Inputs
1 required
Methods
3 connected
- 01RFdiffusion 2
- 02LigandMPNN
- 03ESMFold
Generate scaffolds around an active-site motif with RFdiffusion 2, assign ligand-aware sequences with LigandMPNN, and refold with ESMfold.
Use this templateWhat is enzyme design?
Enzyme design is the process of creating or modifying proteins to catalyze a specified chemical transformation. Computational workflows represent catalytic residues, transition-state or substrate geometry, cofactors, and surrounding structural constraints, then generate scaffolds and sequences intended to support that arrangement. Success requires more than a folded model: catalytic rate, selectivity, stability, and the proposed reaction mechanism must be measured experimentally.
De novo enzyme design starts from reaction geometry rather than from an existing enzyme sequence. Other projects redesign a natural scaffold while preserving catalytic residues. In either case, ligand and cofactor coordinates must remain chemically meaningful throughout motif scaffolding and ligand-aware sequence design.
The computational funnel should reject candidates that distort catalytic geometry, bury unsatisfied polar atoms, clash with substrates, or fail to refold. Laboratory assays then distinguish true catalysis from background reaction, nonspecific binding, contamination, or an unintended mechanism.
When to use enzyme design
- Best fit. Creating catalytic scaffolds or redesigning activity, selectivity, and substrate scope
- Required starting evidence. Catalytic motif geometry, ligand or cofactor context, mechanistic assumptions, and a quantitative assay
Benefits of enzyme design
- Focused search. Targets explicit catalytic geometry
- Connected evidence. Connects structure and sequence design
- Testable candidates. Can explore new scaffold space
Primary limitations
- Model scope. Transition-state models may be wrong
- Score uncertainty. Folded designs may be inactive
- Experimental requirement. Catalytic validation is experimentally demanding
Enzyme design methods
Motif-scaffolding methods place catalytic atoms within generated protein geometry. The motif is only as meaningful as its chemical model, so protonation, cofactors, substrate pose, and geometric tolerances should be documented.
Ligand-aware sequence design assigns residues around both the backbone and non-protein atoms. It can preserve a pocket context but cannot prove that the designed electrostatics, dynamics, or reaction pathway will produce catalysis.
How to run enzyme design online
Use the workflow as an inspectable computational funnel. Preserve the native output of each method, apply explicit acceptance gates, and keep the evidence behind every selected and rejected candidate.
- Define reaction. Specify the chemical transformation, catalytic residues, ligand or transition-state model, and assay controls.
- Encode active site. Prepare a motif PDB whose atom names, bonds, cofactors, and HETATM context are correct.
- Generate scaffolds. Generate scaffolds that preserve the required active-site geometry and reject distorted motifs.
- Design sequences. Assign ligand-aware sequences, refold candidates, and inspect pockets, clashes, and stability.
- Test catalysis. Express selected designs and measure rate, background, selectivity, and mechanism-relevant controls.
How to evaluate enzyme design results
Inspect motif RMSD, catalytic distances and angles, pocket accessibility, clashes, sequence confidence, refold agreement, and alternate ligand poses. Keep native enzyme and no-enzyme controls when available.
Experimental evaluation should report expression, folding, turnover, catalytic efficiency, substrate scope, and selectivity. Controls must rule out spontaneous reaction and adventitious catalysis.
Experimental validation and handoff
Preserve motif atoms, ligand/cofactor coordinates, geometric constraints, sequence-design settings, and rejected candidates. Validate activity with quantitative assays and controls.
Export structures, sequences, settings, scores, logs, and selection criteria together. A reproducible handoff makes computational assumptions visible to the team planning synthesis, expression, biophysical characterization, and functional assays.
How enzyme design works
Generate scaffolds around an active-site motif with RFdiffusion 2, assign ligand-aware sequences with LigandMPNN, and refold with ESMfold.
- Define reaction. Specify the chemical transformation, catalytic residues, ligand or transition-state model, and assay controls.
- Encode active site. Prepare a motif PDB whose atom names, bonds, cofactors, and HETATM context are correct.
- Generate scaffolds. Generate scaffolds that preserve the required active-site geometry and reject distorted motifs.
- Design sequences. Assign ligand-aware sequences, refold candidates, and inspect pockets, clashes, and stability.
- Test catalysis. Express selected designs and measure rate, background, selectivity, and mechanism-relevant controls.
Inputs and outputs
Check formats before running, then inspect and download the result from every workflow step.
Inputs
- Design input.
PDBFASTAJSONTXTAn active-site motif PDB with catalytic residues and ligand or cofactor HETATM records.
Outputs
- Design and review outputs.
PDBFASTACSVJSONScaffold PDB files, ligand-aware FASTA sequences, refolded models, design scores, and validation files.
Tools for enzyme design
Use these methods to prepare inputs, run the core analysis, inspect outputs, and validate the evidence described in this workflow.

RFdiffusion 2
Generate active-site scaffolds with atomic context

RFdiffusion3
Generate enzyme-oriented all-atom backbones

LigandMPNN
Assign ligand-aware protein sequences

ProteinMPNN
Assign alternative scaffold sequences

EvoPro
Optimize sequence and structure objectives

ESMfold
Refold designed sequences for structural comparison

fpocket
Inspect designed pocket geometry

PROPKA 3
Estimate structure-dependent ionization context

MolProbity
Review clashes and stereochemical geometry

Protein stability
Estimate sequence-level stability signals

NetSolP-1.0
Estimate sequence-level solubility

SASA calculator
Measure solvent-accessible surface area
Other protein engineering workflows
Compare related approaches based on the molecular system, available evidence, required inputs, and decision you need to support.
De novo protein design
Generates new protein backbones and sequences rather than modifying a supplied natural template.
Inverse folding
Searches for amino-acid sequences expected to adopt a supplied three-dimensional backbone.
Antibody design
Generates or redesigns antibody and nanobody sequences, structures, and binding loops.
Peptide design
Generates short peptide sequences for binding or other desired molecular properties.
Protein sequence design
Creates or optimizes amino-acid sequences against structural, functional, or developability goals.
Protein binder design
Designs proteins intended to recognize a specified target surface or epitope.
Frequently asked questions
Use chemically consistent coordinates, atom names, residue identities, bonds, and protonation assumptions supported by the selected method. Preserve these records in the motif PDB and document any restraints or surrogate atoms.
You can use it as a hypothesis, but pose uncertainty becomes active-site uncertainty. Compare plausible poses and protonation states, and avoid optimizing an entire campaign around one unvalidated orientation.
Include no-enzyme, inactive-design, denatured-protein, and buffer controls where appropriate, plus a concentration series and time course. Controls should also address contaminating enzymes or cofactors relevant to the expression and purification system.
Not automatically. Reproducible activity above controls can provide a useful starting point for focused redesign or directed evolution, especially when the structure and proposed mechanism remain plausible.
End-to-end enzyme-engineering programs are quote-based rather than sold as a published fixed package. Johnson Matthey’s service covers computational optimization, enzyme-library design, library creation, screening of thousands of variants under process-like conditions, and iterative engineering, but requires the reaction and performance scope before quoting.
Cost is driven by assay development, substrate and cofactor handling, library size, screening throughput, number of engineering rounds, expression and purification, analytical chemistry, and whether process-scale performance is part of the deliverable.
ProteinIQ self-service starts at $29 per month for academic Plus and $99 per month for commercial Pro, with the configured run quoted in credits before submission. A done-for-you enzyme design project is scoped separately; synthesis, expression, and experimental assays are included only when the project quote explicitly says so.
Start with a workflow you can inspect and edit
Add your inputs, review the settings, and keep every structure, score, table, and file connected to the step that produced it.