Use case
Peptide design
Generate compact peptide candidates for a target or property objective, then screen activity and developability signals.
Inputs
1 required
Methods
4 connected
- 01PepMLM
- 02PPAP
- 03NetSolP-1.0
- 04Protein Parameters
Generate linear peptide binders with PepMLM, then review predicted activity, solubility, and physicochemical properties.
Use this templateWhat is peptide design?
Peptide design is the process of creating short amino-acid sequences intended to bind a target or satisfy another functional and physicochemical objective. Compared with larger proteins, peptides have different conformational flexibility, proteolytic stability, cyclization, permeability, charge, and synthesis constraints. Sequence generation is therefore only one stage in a workflow that must also address structure, activity, solubility, aggregation, and experimental tractability.
Target-conditioned language models can generate linear peptide binders from a protein sequence, while structure-aware methods and optimization workflows can incorporate an interface or conformation. Length, termini, modifications, cyclization, and noncanonical residues must match the method’s documented scope.
Fast sequence filters help remove obvious liabilities, but flexible peptides can bind in conformations that are difficult to predict. Synthesis and assays should test binding, specificity, stability, and function under conditions relevant to the intended use.
When to use peptide design
- Best fit. Target-binding peptides and sequence-first peptide lead generation
- Required starting evidence. A target sequence or property objective, length range, chemistry constraints, and an assay
Benefits of peptide design
- Focused search. Searches compact sequence space quickly
- Connected evidence. Supports target-conditioned generation
- Testable candidates. Pairs naturally with synthesis panels
Primary limitations
- Model scope. Peptides can be highly flexible
- Score uncertainty. Proteolysis and clearance may dominate
- Experimental requirement. Many chemistries fall outside model scope
Peptide design methods
PepMLM conditions masked peptide generation on a target protein sequence. Its candidates are hypotheses for linear binders; the model does not by itself specify a unique bound conformation or experimental affinity.
Property-oriented generation and post-generation filters can shape charge, hydrophobicity, length, or predicted activity. Hard chemistry constraints should be applied before ranking so infeasible candidates do not consume the selection budget.
How to run peptide design online
Use the workflow as an inspectable computational funnel. Preserve the native output of each method, apply explicit acceptance gates, and keep the evidence behind every selected and rejected candidate.
- Define target. Confirm the target sequence or structure and define the intended mechanism, site, and assay.
- Set peptide constraints. Set peptide length, termini, allowed residues, charge, modifications, and synthesis constraints.
- Generate sequences. Generate diverse candidates with a method that supports the selected peptide class.
- Screen liabilities. Screen activity signals, solubility, aggregation, proteolysis, and physicochemical properties.
- Synthesize and test. Synthesize a diverse panel and measure binding, specificity, stability, and functional response.
How to evaluate peptide design results
Compare sequence diversity, predicted activity, solubility, aggregation, charge, mass, cleavage susceptibility, and any available structural evidence. Avoid selecting only near-duplicate top-scoring sequences.
Experimental panels should include sequence-diverse candidates, negative controls, target-binding assays, specificity controls, serum or protease stability, and a function-relevant readout.
Experimental validation and handoff
Keep target sequence, peptide constraints, model settings, every generated candidate, and selection rules. Validate binding, specificity, stability, and function experimentally.
Export structures, sequences, settings, scores, logs, and selection criteria together. A reproducible handoff makes computational assumptions visible to the team planning synthesis, expression, biophysical characterization, and functional assays.
How peptide design works
Generate linear peptide binders with PepMLM, then review predicted activity, solubility, and physicochemical properties.
- Define target. Confirm the target sequence or structure and define the intended mechanism, site, and assay.
- Set peptide constraints. Set peptide length, termini, allowed residues, charge, modifications, and synthesis constraints.
- Generate sequences. Generate diverse candidates with a method that supports the selected peptide class.
- Screen liabilities. Screen activity signals, solubility, aggregation, proteolysis, and physicochemical properties.
- Synthesize and test. Synthesize a diverse panel and measure binding, specificity, stability, and functional response.
Inputs and outputs
Check formats before running, then inspect and download the result from every workflow step.
Inputs
- Design input.
PDBFASTAJSONTXTA target protein FASTA sequence plus peptide length and chemistry constraints.
Outputs
- Design and review outputs.
PDBFASTACSVJSONCandidate peptide FASTA sequences, activity estimates, solubility and property tables, and downloadable rankings.
Tools for peptide design
Use these methods to prepare inputs, run the core analysis, inspect outputs, and validate the evidence described in this workflow.

PepMLM
Generate target-conditioned linear peptide binders

PPAP
Predict peptide–protein activity

ODesign
Generate property-oriented peptide candidates

HighFold
Predict cyclic peptide structures

PeptideBuilder
Build peptide coordinate models

Protein parameters
Calculate baseline physicochemical properties

Peptide mass calculator
Calculate peptide molecular masses

Peptide cutter
Review proteolytic cleavage context

NetSolP-1.0
Estimate sequence-level solubility

Protein-Sol
Estimate sequence solubility

Aggrescan3D
Inspect structure-based aggregation-prone regions

TLimmuno2
Review peptide immunogenicity signals
Other protein engineering workflows
Compare related approaches based on the molecular system, available evidence, required inputs, and decision you need to support.
De novo protein design
Generates new protein backbones and sequences rather than modifying a supplied natural template.
Inverse folding
Searches for amino-acid sequences expected to adopt a supplied three-dimensional backbone.
Enzyme design
Designs catalytic scaffolds and ligand-aware sequences around active-site geometry.
Antibody design
Generates or redesigns antibody and nanobody sequences, structures, and binding loops.
Protein sequence design
Creates or optimizes amino-acid sequences against structural, functional, or developability goals.
Protein binder design
Designs proteins intended to recognize a specified target surface or epitope.
Frequently asked questions
Use a cyclic design only when the method and synthesis plan support the intended closure chemistry. Linear peptides are easier to generate and test broadly, while cyclization can restrict conformation and alter stability, permeability, and assay behavior.
Only when the selected tool explicitly supports them. Most sequence models in this workflow use the standard amino-acid alphabet, so noncanonical substitutions should be introduced and evaluated in a separate chemistry-aware step.
Specify amidation, acetylation, linkers, labels, cyclization, and other modifications before synthesis and property interpretation. A modification can change charge, mass, conformation, solubility, and assay readout.
Use orthogonal binding or activity assays, concentration series, counter-screens, and controls for aggregation, fluorescence interference, membrane disruption, or nonspecific adsorption as relevant to the peptide and assay format.
Complete peptide design–make–test programs are generally quote-based. As a transparent academic-core reference, UC Davis lists a 150,000-bead linear peptide library at $1,500 or cyclic library at $2,000 for non-members, screening at $1,000 per day, positive-bead resynthesis at $200 each, and design consultation at $300 per hour; solution-phase resynthesis and custom lead optimization remain individually quoted.
A complete budget depends on library format and size, peptide length and chemistry, modifications, purity and quantity, screening days, hit decoding and resynthesis, counter-screens, stability measurements, and the biological assay used for validation.
ProteinIQ self-service starts at $29 per month for academic Plus and $99 per month for commercial Pro, with the configured run quoted in credits before submission. A done-for-you peptide design project is scoped separately; synthesis, expression, and experimental assays are included only when the project quote explicitly says so.
Start with a workflow you can inspect and edit
Add your inputs, review the settings, and keep every structure, score, table, and file connected to the step that produced it.