Use case

Coarse-grained molecular dynamics

Review compatible coarse-grained trajectories without treating bead-level dynamics as atomistic detail.

Coarse-grained molecular dynamics reviewRead-only preview

Inputs

2 required

Methods

1 connected

  1. 01MD Trajectory Analysis · Coarse-Grained Review

Upload a GRO topology and XTC trajectory, then run selection-aware RMSD, radius-of-gyration, distance, and PCA review.

Use this template

What is coarse-grained molecular dynamics?

Coarse-grained molecular dynamics is a simulation method that represents groups of atoms as simplified interaction sites. This reduces the number of degrees of freedom and smooths the energy landscape, making larger assemblies and longer effective timescales accessible, but the mapping, parameterization, solvent model, and altered kinetics determine which conclusions remain defensible.

Use coarse graining when the scientific scale is the main obstacle: membrane remodeling, oligomerization, large complexes, phase separation, or broad conformational organization. Select a force field developed for the molecular classes involved and document every custom bead or bonded parameter.

ProteinIQ does not currently build or simulate a coarse-grained system. Its trajectory-analysis workflow can review compatible topology and trajectory files with explicit bead selections. Protein-specific defaults such as Cα selections, hydrogen bonds, or atomistic secondary structure may not apply and must be replaced with model-appropriate metrics.

When to use coarse-grained molecular dynamics

  • Best fit. Large assemblies, membranes, phase behavior, and longer effective sampling
  • Required evidence. Externally generated mapped topology, compatible trajectory, parameter set, and bead-level selections

Benefits of coarse-grained molecular dynamics

  • Accesses larger systems. Accesses larger systems for projects focused on large assemblies, membranes, phase behavior, and longer effective sampling.
  • Extends practical sampling. Extends practical sampling for projects focused on large assemblies, membranes, phase behavior, and longer effective sampling.
  • Supports mesoscale hypotheses. Supports mesoscale hypotheses for projects focused on large assemblies, membranes, phase behavior, and longer effective sampling.

Primary limitations

  • Loses atomistic detail. Loses atomistic detail. Address this with externally generated mapped topology, compatible trajectory, parameter set, and bead-level selections.
  • Kinetics may be distorted. Kinetics may be distorted. Address this with externally generated mapped topology, compatible trajectory, parameter set, and bead-level selections.
  • Transferability is model dependent. Transferability is model dependent. Address this with externally generated mapped topology, compatible trajectory, parameter set, and bead-level selections.

Coarse-grained molecular dynamics methods

Coarse-grained force fields differ in mapping resolution, interaction potentials, solvent treatment, and parameterization philosophy. A Martini result should retain its force-field release and mapping files because model versions are not interchangeable.

Backmapping can produce atomistic starting structures, but it does not restore information that was absent from the coarse-grained trajectory. Atomistic relaxation and validation are required before interpreting local contacts or stereochemistry.

Coarse-grained molecular dynamics applications

Coarse-grained molecular dynamics is best suited to large assemblies, membranes, phase behavior, and longer effective sampling. Match the modeled system, timescale, resolution, and ensemble to the observable rather than choosing a protocol because it produces a longer trajectory or more elaborate figure.

Use simulation as model-based evidence. Connect trajectory observations to experimental data, alternative parameterizations, independent starts, and uncertainty whenever the downstream claim concerns mechanism, affinity, kinetics, stability, or population.

How to run coarse-grained molecular dynamics online

The connected workflow is a post-run review workflow. Generate the scientific simulation externally, preserve its method-native records, then upload compatible files for complementary structural analysis.

  1. Choose mapping. Choose a force field and mapping whose training domain matches the system and question.
  2. Build externally. Build, equilibrate, and simulate the coarse-grained system in an external engine.
  3. Upload files. Upload the GRO topology and XTC trajectory and define explicit bead selections.
  4. Analyze beads. Review compactness, distances, collective motion, aggregation, and boundary handling.
  5. Validate conclusions. Compare key claims with experiments, atomistic refinement, or independent simulations.

How to interpret coarse-grained molecular dynamics results

Interpret observables at the model resolution. Bead distances, cluster sizes, membrane curvature, and assembly organization may be meaningful; side-chain hydrogen bonds or detailed rotamers generally are not.

Effective time does not always equal physical time. Report the simulation clock and any model-specific time mapping separately, and avoid kinetic rate claims unless validated for the chosen model and process.

How coarse-grained molecular dynamics works

Upload a GRO topology and XTC trajectory, then run selection-aware RMSD, radius-of-gyration, distance, and PCA review.

  1. Choose mapping. Choose a force field and mapping whose training domain matches the system and question.
  2. Build externally. Build, equilibrate, and simulate the coarse-grained system in an external engine.
  3. Upload files. Upload the GRO topology and XTC trajectory and define explicit bead selections.
  4. Analyze beads. Review compactness, distances, collective motion, aggregation, and boundary handling.
  5. Validate conclusions. Compare key claims with experiments, atomistic refinement, or independent simulations.

Inputs and outputs

Check formats before running, then inspect and download the result from every workflow step.

Inputs

  • Simulation evidence. PDB mmCIF TPR GRO XTC A compatible GRO topology and XTC trajectory with mapping files, force-field version, and explicit bead selections.

Outputs

  • Simulation outputs. XTC PDB CSV JSON ZIP Selection-aware structural and collective metrics for a compatible coarse-grained trajectory.

Frequently asked questions

Start with a workflow you can inspect and edit

Add your inputs, review the settings, and keep every structure, score, table, and file connected to the step that produced it.

Open review workflow